Animal - Revision history

Nicolette at 16:06, 1 August 2022

2022-08-01T16:06:01Z

Nicolette at 16:02, 1 August 2022

2022-08-01T16:02:28Z

Nicolette at 15:54, 8 March 2022

2022-03-08T15:54:49Z

Nicolette at 00:58, 11 April 2020

2020-04-11T00:58:06Z

Nicolette at 22:17, 8 April 2020

2020-04-08T22:17:28Z

Nicolette at 20:24, 24 March 2020

2020-03-24T20:24:56Z

Nicolette at 22:24, 20 February 2020

2020-02-20T22:24:34Z

Nicolette at 16:44, 19 February 2020

2020-02-19T16:44:45Z

Nicolette: Created page with "An '''animal''' is the legal term for any non-human terrestrial living creature working in Hollywood. This does not extend to aliens (which are not terrestrial) or mutants..."

2020-02-14T08:50:50Z

Created page with "An '''animal''' is the legal term for any non-human terrestrial living creature working in Hollywood. This does not extend to aliens (which are not terrestrial) or mutants..."

New page

An '''animal''' is the legal term for any non-human terrestrial living creature working in [[Hollywood]]. This does not extend to aliens (which are not terrestrial) or mutants (which are officially classified under the law as hazardous materials). Many animals have developed human-level intelligence from decades of exposure to the film industry, which prizes the ability to perform tricks on cue from all living creatures, including humans.

Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: anthropomorphic, where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and talking, where they have not.

[[Category:Demographics]][[Category:Animals| ]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 "Don't most animals walk?"
-"Oh, la-di-''dah!'' Looks like ''someone'' wants to show off his fancy college education."|Howie Harland & Eli Spencer}}
+"Oh, la-di-''dah!'' Looks like ''someone'' wants to show off his fancy college education."}}
 Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: '''anthropomorphic''', where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and '''talking''', where they have not.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 == Physiology ==
-{{Quote|side right|"What you need to understand, kid, is that animals in Hollywood? Two types: walking or talking. Anything else ends up as lunchmeat."
+{{Fiction|right|"What you need to understand, kid, is that animals in Hollywood? Two types: walking or talking. Anything else ends up as lunchmeat."
 "Don't most animals walk?"

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 == Physiology ==
 Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: '''anthropomorphic''', where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and '''talking''', where they have not.
-Anthropomorphic animals (often shortened to '''anthros''') are technically mutations, although since there is no clear defining ''cause'' of this mutation beyond the general need of Hollywood for animals to make better actors, it gets widely ignored. Their broadly humanoid appearance is not just limited to a bipedal stance and opposable thumbs, it also includes a more expressive face and even such peculiarities as the ability to grow facial hair despite already having fur all over their bodies. It is theorized that the ambient weirdness of Hollywood forces humanizing traits upon everything that resides there, to which some demographics are innately more receptive.
+Anthropomorphic animals (often shortened to '''anthros''') are technically mutations, although since there is no clear defining cause of this mutation it gets widely ignored. Their broadly humanoid appearance is not just limited to a bipedal stance and opposable thumbs, it also includes a more expressive face. Anthropomorphic animals also can posses such peculiarities as the ability to grow facial hair, even if they already have fur. It is theorized that the ambient weirdness of Hollywood forces humanizing traits upon everything that resides there, to which some demographics are innately more receptive.
 Talking animals (often shortened to '''talkers''') are not completely biologically identical to their non-talking peers. Like anthros, they have more expressive faces, which may have been necessary to develop the capacity for speech. Many exhibit very human mannerisms when they talk, such as gesturing, although their gestures tend to be constrained by their inhuman shape. It is hard to snap one's fingers if one has no fingers, for example.
 {{Demographic}}
 [[Category:Demographics]][[Category:Animals| ]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 An '''animal''' is the legal term for any non-human terrestrial living creature working in [[Hollywood]]. This does not extend to [[alien]]s (which are not terrestrial) or [[mutant]]s (which are officially classified under the law as hazardous materials). Many animals have developed human-level intelligence from decades of exposure to the film industry, which prizes the ability to perform tricks on cue from all living creatures, not just human beings.
 Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: '''anthropomorphic''', where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and '''talking''', where they have not.
 {{Demographic}}
 [[Category:Demographics]][[Category:Animals| ]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 8 April 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: '''anthropomorphic''', where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and '''talking''', where they have not.		Intelligent animals are further divided into two subgroups: '''anthropomorphic''', where the animal in question has developed a physical build roughly on par for a human being of the same size and weight, and '''talking''', where they have not.
		+
		+	{{Demographic}}

	[[Category:Demographics]][[Category:Animals\| ]]		[[Category:Demographics]][[Category:Animals\| ]]